Midland Funding, LLC v. Barbara Garrett
FSTCV116011332S
????Decided: January 18, 2012
The defendant’s Motion to Reargue (#?108.00) is denied for the following reasons:
1.?It is dated January 6, 2012 and certified on January 6, 2012, which is the same date of the motion and certification date as Motion to Reargue (#?106.00).
2.?The two-page body of Motion to Reargue (#?108.00) is identical to the two-page body of Motion to Reargue (#?106.00).
3.?On January 10, 2012 this court denied Motion to Reargue (#?106.00) in a two-page Memorandum of Decision that was date stamped January 10, 2012.
4.?The body of both Motions (#?106.00) and (#?108.00) address this court’s ten-page December 23, 2011 Memorandum of Decision (#?104.00) and this court denied Motion to Reargue (#?106.00) by its January 10, 2012 two-page Memorandum of Decision (#?107.00).
5.?The only difference between Motion to Reargue (#?106.00) and (#?108.00) is the attachment of Exhibits A, B and C, documents that were already in the court file. ? Exhibits A and B were before the court and considered by the court in its December 23, 2011 Memorandum of Decision (#?104.00). ? Exhibits A, B and C were before the court and considered by the court in its January 10, 2012 Memorandum of Decision (#?107.00).
6.?This Motion to Reargue (#?108.00) fails to set ?forth the decision and order which is the subject of the motion.? ?P.B. ??11?12(a). ? This court has already considered and decided the Motion to Reargue addressed to this court’s December 23, 2011 Memorandum of Decision (#?107.00).
Any one of the above six reasons is sufficient by itself to support this court’s denial of Defendant’s Motion to Reargue (#?108.00).
BY THE COURT
Hon. Kevin Tierney
Judge Trial Referee
Tierney, Kevin, J.T.R.