373 A.2d 1209

ETHEL E. MURPHY ET AL. v. STEVEN SORACCO

Supreme Court of Connecticut

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to defend against the named plaintiff’s appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that unless the defendant files his brief on or before June 10, 1977, the judgment be set aside and the case be remanded with direction to render judgment for the named plaintiff.

John B. Glendon, for the appellant (named plaintiff).

Noel R. Newman, for the appellee (defendant).

Argued June 7, 1977

Decided June 7, 1977

Page 757

Tagged: