869 A.2d 279
No. (AC 24972).Appellate Court of Connecticut.
Lavery, C. J., and Schaller and Hennessy, Js.
Submitted on briefs February 24, 2005.
Officially released March 29, 2005.
Petitioner’s appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Tolland, Fuger, J.
PER CURIAM.
After careful review of the record and briefs, we conclude that the petitioner has not demonstrated that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason, that a court could resolve the issues in a different manner or that the questions raised deserve encouragement to proceed further. See Lozada
v. Deeds, 498 U.S. 430, 431-32, 111 S. Ct. 860, 112 L. Ed. 2d 956 (1991); Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 616, 646 A.2d 126 (1994).
The appeal is dismissed.
MICHAEL A. FIANO v. OLD SAYBROOK FIRE COMPANY NO. 1, INC., ET AL. AC 39321…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOHN A. FRAZIER AC 38880 COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE…
ADRIANA RUIZ ET AL. v. VICTORY PROPERTIES, LLC AC 39381 COURT OF APPEALS OF THE…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MARY E. BAGNASCHI AC 39072 COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE…
AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. ANDREW MULDOWNEY ET AL. SC 19794 Supreme Court of Connecticut…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JARAH MICAH DAVIS AC 40232 COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE…