CASE NO. 1402 CRB-7-92-4Workers’ Compensation Commission
JUNE 9, 1993
ORDER
The respondent-Atlas Construction Company’s May 26, 1993 request for modification of the Compensation Review Board’s May 7, 1993 Order was based on the U.S. Supreme Court decision, District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of Trade, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 580, L.Ed.2d (1992) and the Connecticut Supreme court order in Luis v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al Almeida v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Turcotta v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al (S.C. 14536) of April 27, 1993. The United States and the Connecticut Supreme Court decisions held that Connecticut was preempted by the federal government’s E.R.I.S.A. legislation from enacting Sec. 31-284b. Therefore there is no jurisdiction in the Workers’ Compensation Commission to make Sec. 31-284b orders. A jurisdictional objection may be made at any time.
By the Compensation Review Board,
Jesse Frankl, Chairman Presiding Commissioner for the Compensation Review Board Panel Commissioners George Waldron and Donald H. Doyle
MICHAEL A. FIANO v. OLD SAYBROOK FIRE COMPANY NO. 1, INC., ET AL. AC 39321…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOHN A. FRAZIER AC 38880 COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE…
ADRIANA RUIZ ET AL. v. VICTORY PROPERTIES, LLC AC 39381 COURT OF APPEALS OF THE…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MARY E. BAGNASCHI AC 39072 COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE…
AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. ANDREW MULDOWNEY ET AL. SC 19794 Supreme Court of Connecticut…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JARAH MICAH DAVIS AC 40232 COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE…