982 A.2d 649
(AC 30614)Appellate Court of Connecticut
Flynn, C. J., and Beach and Robinson, Js.
Argued September 8, 2009
Officially released November 13, 2009[*]
Procedural History
Action to recover damages for, inter alia, false imprisonment and medical malpractice, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford, where the court, Prescott, J., granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and rendered judgment thereon, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court. Affirmed.
Emil D. Anghel, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).
Jessica D. Meerbergen, with whom, on the brief, was Louis B. Blumenfeld, for the appellee (defendant).
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The pro se plaintiff, Emil D. Anghel, [1] appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center. Having considered the respective arguments advanced by the parties, we note that no issues of material fact were in dispute and that the plaintiff’s appeal of his original federal action was still
Page 140
pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit at the time he brought the action in state court. Accordingly, we conclude that the plaintiff’s reliance on General Statutes § 52-592[2]
was premature.[3] The court properly granted the motion for summary judgment.
The judgment is affirmed.
(1986). Nevertheless, while the plaintiff is afforded this latitude, the court is equally cognizant that “the right of self-representation provides no attendant license not to comply with relevant rules of procedure and substantive law.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) New Haven v. Bonner, 272 Conn. 489, 498, 863 A.2d 680 (2005).
“(d) The provisions of this section shall apply to . . . any action brought to the United States circuit or district court for the district of Connecticut which has been dismissed without trial upon its merits or because of lack of jurisdiction in such court. If such action is within the jurisdiction of any state court, the time for bringing the action to the state court shall commence from the date of dismissal in the United States court, or, if an appeal or writ of error has been taken from the dismissal, from the final determination of the appeal or writ of error. . . .”