127 A. 921
Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, New Haven, January Term, 1925
WHEELER, C. J., BEACH, CURTIS, KEELER and HAINES, Js.
Argued January 21st, 1925
Decided February 23d 1925.
ACTION to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract by the defendant to take and pay for a course of instruction in photography, brought to and tried by the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County, Hall, Acting Judge; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiff. No error.
Harry Allison Goldstein, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Frank M. Canfield, for the appellee (defendant).
PER CURIAM.
The so-called claims of law made in the argument in the trial court were claims of fact. The issues of fact were found upon conflicting evidence in favor of the defendant. It is under such circumstances useless to attempt their retrial in this court.
The second reason of appeal was not made in the trial court and for that reason will not be considered. Reason of appeal three, that the court mistook the law in rendering judgment for the plaintiff, is general and cannot under the rules be regarded. Reason of appeal four, based upon corrections of the finding, is not well taken. The appeal is entirely without merit.
There is no error.
Page 755