BENOIT v. FRITO-LAY, INC., 1473 CRB-2-92-7 (5-7-93)

STEPHEN BENOIT, CLAIMANT-APPELLEE v. FRITO-LAY, INC., EMPLOYER, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, CRAWFORD COMPANY, INSURER and SECOND INJURY FUND, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

CASE NO. 1473 CRB-2-92-7Workers’ Compensation Commission
MAY 7, 1993

Jesse M. Frankl, Chairman, Compensation Review Board, Workers’ Compensation Commission

ORDER

Pursuant to the April 27, 1993 Connecticut Supreme Court Order, Luis v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Almeida v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Turcotte v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al (S.C. 14536) and the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of Trade, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 580, L.Ed.2d (1992) the Second District July 8, 1992 award of Sec. 31-284b benefits is reversed and set aside.

By the Compensation Review Board,