BISHOP v. MASONIC HEALTHCARE CENTER, NO. 5202 CRB-8-07-3 (3-27-2007)

JAMMIE BISHOP, CLAIMANT-APPELLEE v. MASONIC HEALTHCARE CENTER, EMPLOYER and WEBSTER RISK SERVICES, INSURER, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS

CASE NO. 5202 CRB-8-07-3CONNECTICUT COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD CONNECTICUT WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
MARCH 27, 2007

ORDER

Respondents have filed a Petition for Review from a February 20, 2007 Order pursuant to Sec. 31-294d. Said order was issued subsequent to an informal hearing. Absent a record this board cannot conduct a meaningful review pursuant to Sec. 31-301(a). The matter is therefore remanded to the trial commissioner acting for the Eighth District for a Formal Hearing or other appropriate action. See Sypher v. Getty Granite Company, 5077 CRB-8-06-4 (May 4, 2006); Ramos v. The Hartford Courant, 5034 CRB-1-05-12 (January 18, 2006).

Page 1