BOGLI v. TOWN OF GLASTONBURY, 1537 CRB-8-92-10 (12-28-92)


THORALYN BOGLI, CLAIMANT-APPELLEE v. TOWN OF GLASTONBURY, EMPLOYER, CONNECTICUT INTERLOCAL RISK MANAGEMENT, INSURER, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES, LAGANN, ROBERGE COMPANY, EMPLOYER, U.S.F. G., INSURER, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, UNITED TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH CENTER, EMPLOYER, CIGNA INSURANCE, INSURER, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS

CASE NO. 1537 CRB-8-92-10Workers’ Compensation Commission
DECEMBER 28, 1992

Jesse M. Frankl, Chairman, Compensation Review Board, Workers’ Compensation Commission

ORDER

Respondents, Lagann, Roberge and Company, U.S.F. G., United Technologies Research Center and CIGNA Insurance filed a Petition for Review from the trial commissioner’s October 14, 1992 Order pursuant to Sec. 31-308a.

The Order was issued as the result of an informal hearing held October 13, 1992.

Since there is no record of the proceedings before the trial commissioner, the Compensation Review Board cannot properly consider this appeal in accordance with Sec. 31-301 and Administrative Regulation Sec. 31-301-1. See e.g. Nevers v. Environmental Waste Removal, 10 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 96, 1166 CRD-5-91-1 (1992); Kempesta v. Hendels Gas and Oil Co., 9 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 152, 998 CRD-2-90-4 (1991); Palmer v. UTC/Pratt and Whitney, 9 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 150, 1079 CRD-8-90-7 (1991); Laime v. American Standard, 9 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 62, 914 CRD-2-89-9 (1991); Waddington v. Electric Boat/Division of General Dynamics, 8 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 149, 720 CRD-2-88-4 (1990); Mauro v. Electric Boat Division, 713 CRD-2-88-3 (1989).

The appeal is therefore dismissed as there must be further proceedings below before an appeal will lie.