924 A.2d 141
No. (AC 27218).Appellate Court of Connecticut
Gruendel, Lavine and Peters, Js.
Argued February 23, 2007.
Officially released May 29, 2007.
Procedural History
Appeal from the plaintiffs assessment of damages for the taking by eminent domain of certain of the named defendant’s real property, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New Britain and tried to the court, Hon. Arnold W. Aronson, judge trial referee; judgment increasing the award of damages, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court, which reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the case for a new trial; thereafter, the matter was tried to the court, Burke, J.; judgment awarding the named defendant $1, from which the named defendant appealed to this court. Affirmed.
Michael P. Barry, for the appellant (named defendant).
Drew S. Graham, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, for the appellee (plaintiff).
Page 402
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This condemnation action returns to us following a remand to the trial court. See Commissioner of Transportation
v. Bakery Place Ltd. Partnership, 83 Conn. App. 343, 849 A.2d 896 (2004). In this appeal, the defendant Bakery Place Limited Partnership[1] challenges the court’s award of $1 in damages as just compensation for the taking of certain real property in New Britain. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Our examination of the record and briefs and our consideration of the arguments of the parties persuade us that the judgment should be affirmed. On the facts of this case, the issues properly were resolved in the court’s complete and well reasoned memorandum of decision. See Commissioner of Transportation v. Bakery Place Ltd. Partnership, 50 Conn. Sup. 299, 925 A.2d 468 (2005). We therefore adopt it as the proper statement of the relevant facts, issues and applicable law, as it would serve no useful purpose for us to repeat the discussion contained therein. See State v Pepper, 272 Conn. 10, 14, 860 A.2d 1221 (2004) Santiago v. State, 64 Conn. App. 67, 68-69, 779 A.2d 775, cert. denied, 258 Conn. 913, 782 A.2d 1246
(2001).
The judgment is affirmed.