598 A.2d 365
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The petitioner David Copeland’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 10, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“After a defendant has been found guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, does the trial court have the authority to impose a criminal sentence consecutive to the defendant’s psychiatric commitment?”
David J. Wenc, in support of the petition.
James M. Ralls, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Decided October 16, 1991