DiBLASE v. LOGISTEC OF CONNECTICUT, INC., NO. 5305 CRB-3-07-11 (1-3-2008)

ANTHONY DiBLASE, CLAIMANT-APPELLEE v. LOGISTEC OF CONNECTICUT, INC. EMPLOYER and LAMORTE BURNS CO. INSURER, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS

CASE NO. 5305 CRB-3-07-11 CLAIM NO. 300060645CONNECTICUT COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD CONNECTICUT WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
JANUARY 3, 2008

ORDER
JOHN A. MASTROPIETRO, CHAIRMAN.

Respondents-Appellants, Logistec of Connecticut, Inc., and Lamorte Burns Company have filed a Petition for Review from the trial commissioner’s ruling of November 1, 2007 denying respondents’ Motion to Quash and for Protective Order. Said ruling was issued absent a hearing creating a record. No transcripts or exhibits exist. Consequently, this board cannot properly consider this appeal pursuant to Sec. 31-301(a). The matter is therefore remanded to the trial commissioner acting for the Third District for a formal hearing or other appropriate action. SeeBosco v. James V. Bosco, DDS, 5184 CRB-3-07-1 (February 13, 2007).

John A. Mastropietro, Chairman, Compensation Review Board Workers’ Compensation Commission

Page 1