DIMITROPOLIS v. O’CONNOR, 1525 CRB-1-92-9 (5-7-93)


ANTHONY DIMITROPOLIS, CLAIMANT-APPELLEE v. THOMAS O’CONNOR, EMPLOYER, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT and NATIONAL UNION, c/o GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC., INSURER, and SECOND INJURY FUND, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

CASE NO. 1525 CRB-1-92-9Workers’ Compensation Commission
MAY 7, 1993

Jesse M. Frankl, Chairman, Compensation Review Board, Workers’ Compensation Commission

ORDER

Pursuant to the April 27, 1993 Connecticut Supreme Court Order, Luis v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Almeida v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Turcotte v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al (S.C. 14536) and the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of Trade, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 580, L.Ed.2d (1992) the First District September 23, 1992 award of Sec. 31-284b benefits is reversed and set aside.

By the Compensation Review Board,