28 A.3d 958

MICHAEL FEINBERG v. JOANNE FEINBERG

(SC 18414)Supreme Court of Connecticut

Rogers, C. J., and Norcott, Palmer, Zarella and McLachlan, Js.

Argued September 8, 2011

Officially released October 11, 2011

Procedural History
Action for the dissolution of a marriage, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford and tried to the court, Hon. Simon S. Cohen, judge trial referee, who, exercising the powers of the Superior Court, rendered judgment dissolving the marriage and granting certain other relief; there-after, the court, Hon. John R. Caruso, judge trial referee, granted the plaintiff’s motion to modify custody, from which the defendant appealed to the Appellate Court, Bishop an Pellegrino, Js., with Flynn, C. J., dissenting, which affirmed the trial court’s judgment, and the defendant, on the granting of certification, appealed to this court. Appeal dismissed.

Joanne Feinberg, pro se, the appellant (defendant).

Michael Feinberg, pro se, the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion
PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Joanne Feinberg, appeals[1] from the judgment of the Appellate Court

Page 464

affirming the postdissolution order of the trial court granting the plaintiff, Michael Feinberg, physical custody of the parties’ minor child. Feinberg v. Feinberg, 114 Conn. App. 589, 597, 970 A.2d 776 (2009). After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

[1] We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the decision of the trial court ordering that the minor child should change schools and his place of primary residence?”Feinberg v. Feinberg, 293 Conn. 901, 975 A.2d 1277 (2009).

Page 464

Tagged: