603 A.2d 445

HENRY FRIEDLANDER v. SAUL KWARTIN ET AL.

(10521)Appellate Court of Connecticut

O’CONNELL, NORCOTT and FOTI, Js.

Argued February 21, 1992

Decision released March 10, 1992

Action to recover damages for, inter alia, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Stamford-Norwalk, where the court, Lewis, J., granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and rendered judgment thereon, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court. Affirmed.

Henry Friedlander, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).

Saul Kwartin, with whom was Garie J. Mulcahey, for the appellees (defendants).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

Tagged: