297 A.2d 233

MARTIN HERRMANN III v. WILLIAM R. MANIATIS

Supreme Court of Connecticut

It appearing that the plaintiff in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

George L. Eastman, for the appellant (plaintiff).

No appearance for the appellee (defendant).

Argued December 5, 1972

Decided December 5, 1972

Page 679

Tagged: