648 A.2d 163

HOME INSURANCE COMPANY v. AETNA LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 35 Conn. App. 94 (AC 12434), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s summary judgment on the ground that this was a sufficient question of fact regarding whether Barry Schuss intended to cause damage, within the meaning of the defendant’s policy exclusion?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15052.

Edward W. Case, in support of the petition.

William F. Gallagher, in opposition.

Decided September 20, 1994

Tagged: