244 A.2d 411

WILLIAM KOBRYN v. GLADYS W. KOBRYN

Supreme Court of Connecticut

KING, C.J., ALCORN, HOUSE, THIM and RYAN, Js.

Argued June 7, 1968

Decided June 25, 1968

Action for a divorce, brought to the Superior Court in Litchfield County, where the defendant filed a counterclaim and the issues were tried to the court, Meyers, J.; judgment for the defendant on the complaint and on the counterclaim, and appeal by the plaintiff. No error.

Julius Watstein, with whom was Herbert Watstein, for the appellant (plaintiff).

H. Gibson Guion, with whom, on the brief, wa Hadley W. Austin, for the appellee (defendant).

PER CURIAM.

The finding is not subject to correction in any respect which will assist the plaintiff. Any correction to which the plaintiff is entitled would not change the result in any way. Taylor v. Taylor, 154 Conn. 340, 341, 225 A.2d 196; Sipp v. Sipp, 151 Conn. 705, 197 A.2d 73. The assignment of error on the evidential ruling was not briefed

Page 639

and must therefore be considered abandoned Bartlett v. Flaherty, 155 Conn. 203, 204, 230 A.2d 436; Shelton Yacht Cabana Club, Inc. v. Suto, 150 Conn. 251, 254, 188 A.2d 493; Hannifan v. Sachs, 150 Conn. 162, 165, 187 A.2d 253.

The conclusions which the court reached find ample support in the subordinate facts.

There is no error.

Page 641

Tagged: