LUIS v. FRITO-LAY, INC., 1089 CRD-2-90-8 (5-3-93)

FRANK A. LUIS, CLAIMANT-APPELLEE v. FRITO-LAY, INC., EMPLOYER and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO., INSURER, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS and SECOND INJURY AND COMPENSATION ASSURANCE FUND, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE ALBERT ALMEIDA, CLAIMANT-APPELLEE v. FRITO-LAY, INC., EMPLOYER and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO., INSURER, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS and SECOND INJURY AND COMPENSATION ASSURANCE FUND, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE ROGER TURCOTTE, CLAIMANT-APPELLEE v. FRITO-LAY, INC., EMPLOYER and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO., INSURER, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS and SECOND INJURY AND COMPENSATION ASSURANCE FUND, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

CASE NOS. 1089 CRD-2-90-8, 1090 CRD-2-90-8, 1091 CRD-2-90-8Workers’ Compensation Commission
MAY 3, 1993

ORDER

Pursuant to the April 27, 1993 Connecticut Supreme Court Order, Luis v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Almeida v. Frito-Lay Inc., et al; Turcotte v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al (S.C. 14536) and the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of Trade, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 580, L.Ed.2d (1992) the February 6, 1992 decision of the Compensation Review Board affirming a Second District Sec. 31-284b award of benefits in the above named appeals is reversed and the award is set aside.

By the Compensation Review Board,

John Arcudi, Commissioner Presiding Commissioner for the Compensation Review Board Panel

Leave a Reply Cancel reply