584 A.2d 488

JUDITH OSGOOD v. MALLORY CRAWFORD MALLORY CRAWFORD v. JUDITH OSGOOD

(8641)Appellate Court of Connecticut

SPALLONE, O’CONNELL and HEIMAN, Js.

Argued January 16, 1991

Decision released February 5, 1991

Action, in the first case, to recover on a promissory note, and action, in the second case, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as a result of the defendant’s alleged infliction of emotional distress, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford, where the cases were consolidated and tried to the jury before O’Neill, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the first case, and directed verdict and judgment for the defendant in the second case, from which the defendant in the first case, the plaintiff in the second case, filed a consolidated appeal to this court. Affirmed.

Mallory Crawford, pro se, the appellant (defendant in the first case, plaintiff in the second case).

Thomas J. Hagarty, Jr., for the appellee (plaintiff in the first case, defendant in the second case).

PER CURIAM.

Two judgments of the trial court are the subjects of this appeal.

In Osgood v. Crawford, the defendant is appealing from the judgment rendered on the jury’s verdict for the plaintiff. In Crawford v. Osgood, the plaintiff is appealing from the judgment rendered after the jury returned a directed verdict for the defendant.

Our review of the record, transcripts and briefs in light of the claims properly before us reveals that the trial court acted properly and in accordance with applicable law.

The judgments are affirmed.

Page 811

Tagged: