SAMUEL QUINN, CLAIMANT-APPELLEE v. PRIME TECHNOLOGY, LLC, ET AL, EMPLOYER AND. BERKLEY ADMINISTRATORS OF CONNECTICUT, INSURER, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT

CASE NO. 5222 CRB 3-07-4 CLAIM NO. 300074127CONNECTICUT COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD CONNECTICUT WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
MAY 14, 2007

Page 1

ORDER
Respondent, Berkley Administrators of Connecticut filed a Petition for Review April 23, 2007 from a Sec. 31-288 and Sec. 31-300 sanction issued April 16, 2007 by the Commissioner acting for the Sixth District. No record exists. Absent a record this board cannot properly consider an appeal under Sec. 31-301. The matter is therefore remanded to the trial commissioner acting for the Sixth District for a Formal Hearing or other appropriate action. See Chung v. Wal-Mart, 4474 CRB-2-02-1 (November 13, 2002); Murphy v. Highfield Country Club, 5117 CRB-5-05-7 (August 22, 2006).

John A Mastropietro, Chairman

Compensation Review Board

Workers’ Compensation Commission

Tagged: