626 A.2d 1346

MARTIN ROSENFELD ET AL. v. DANIEL McCAIN

(11820)Appellate Court of Connecticut

FOTI, FREEDMAN and SCHALLER, Js.

Argued June 14, 1993

Decision released July 6, 1993

Action to recover damages for alleged fraudulent nondisclosure in connection with the sale of the defendant’s motor vehicle, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain, geographical area number thirteen, where the court, Doyle, J., granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, and rendered judgment thereon, from which the plaintiffs appealed to this court. Affirmed.

Page 939

Martin Rosenfeld, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).

Bruce D. Tyler, for the appellee (defendant).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

Tagged: