SCHOENBERG v. SCHOENBERG, No. FA 06-4026607 (Jan. 25, 2011)

MATTHEW SCHOENBERG v. ERIN V. SCHOENBERG.

2011 Ct. Sup. 3577
No. FA 06-4026607Connecticut Superior Court Judicial District of Hartford at Hartford
January 25, 2011

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
MARK H. TAYLOR, J.

By agreement of the parties, a psychological evaluation by Dr. Hiebel was ordered by the court on August 6, 2008. The court further finds that the parties understood that the evaluation by Dr. Hiebel was exempt from confidentiality pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-146c(c)(1). Based upon the evidence presented by Dr. Hiebel, the court finds that although the parties engaged in the mediation of some disputes during their extended evaluation, this process was within the scope of a court-ordered psychological evaluation. Therefore, the court orders that the evaluation be updated and completed with a reasonable period of time.

CT Page 3578