565 A.2d 540

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RICHARD LAMME

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 19 Conn. App. 594, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“What standard governs the determination of whether the detention of a criminal defendant is `clearly warranted’ under article first, 9, of the Connecticut constitution?”

James J. Ruane, in support of the petition.

James M. Ralls, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided October 12, 1989

Tagged: