534 A.2d 627

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. GARY LANCASTER

(5656)Appellate Court of Connecticut

BORDEN, BIELUCH and O’CONNELL, Js.

Argued November 13, 1987

Decision released November 27, 1987

Substitute information charging the defendant with the crime of robbery in the first degree, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New Haven and tried to the jury before Testo, J.; verdict and judgment of guilty, from which the defendant appealed to this court. No error.

Howard I. Gemeiner for the appellant (defendant).

Carolyn K. Longstreth, deputy assistant state’s attorney, with whom were Robert Devlin, assistant state’s attorney, and, on the brief, Alice Osedach, legal intern, for the appellee (state).

PER CURIAM.

After a complete examination of the record, transcripts and briefs filed in this matter and alter having afforded the defendant’s sole claim of error the appropriate scope of review, we conclude that the defendant’s claim is not reviewable because of the lack of an adequate record. This case is controlled by State v. Vitale, 190 Conn. 219, 226, 460 A.2d 961 (1983), and State v. Mitchell, 8 Conn. App. 598, 605, 513 A.2d 1268, cert. denied, 201 Conn. 810, 516 A.2d 887 (1986).

There is no error.

Page 802

Tagged: