610 A.2d 179

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ROSALBINA NOVOA

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 596, is granted, limited to the following question:

Page 906

“In the circumstances of this case, was the use of wiretap evidence permitted by the provisions of General Statutes 54-41p (b) and 54-41b?”

Bruce A. Sturman, public defender, in support of the petition.

Kevin T. Kane, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided June 25, 1992

Tagged: