554 A.2d 742

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. FRANK ROGERS

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn. App. 245, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court err in affirming the defendant’s conviction and holding that the wiretap panel’s failure to make a written determination of probable cause, pursuant to General Statutes 54-41d (7) and 54-41e, that a special need existed to intercept wire communications over a public telephone was not reversible error?”

Robert M. Casale, in support of the petition.

Harry Weller, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided January 12, 1989

Tagged: