101 A. 23 FREDERICK OSTMAN vs. HARRY P. LEE. Supreme Court of Connecticut Second Judicial District, Norwich, April Term, 1917. PRENTICE, C. J., RORABACK, WHEELER, SHUMWAY and CASE, Js. An appeal to this court will not be erased merely because it does not contain a prayer for relief. In an action to recover the price […]
Articles Tagged: 101 A. 23
ESPOSITO v. TAMMARO, 91 Conn. 600 (1917)
101 A. 23 VINCENZO ESPOSITO vs. JULIA TAMMARO. Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, Bridgeport, April Term, 1917. PRENTICE, C. J., RORABACK, WHEELER, BEACH and SHUMWAY, Js. Questions of law not raised in the court below are not entitled to consideration in this court. Submitted on briefs April 11th, 1917 Decided June 1st, 1917. […]