142 A. 466 JAMES H. KANE ET AL. vs. WILLIAM F. KANE, EXECUTOR, ET ALS. Supreme Court of Connecticut First Judicial District, Hartford, May Term, 1928. WHEELER, C.J., MALTBIE, HAINES, HINMAN and BANKS, Js. A finding of facts should not recite the testimony of a witness or excerpts from it. An admission by one co-executor […]
Articles Tagged: 142 A. 466
HARTY v. HASKELL, 108 Conn. 95 (1928)
142 A. 466 MARGARET HARTY vs. MABEL E. HASKELL ET AL. Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, Bridgeport, April Term, 1928. MALTBIE, HAINES, HINMAN, BANKS and WOLFE, Js. Brevity and simplicity are commendable characteristics in a charge in a negligence action, but not when carried to such an extremity that an explanation of the […]