SOUTH END BANK TRUST CO. v. NASIN, 147 Conn. 215 (1960)

158 A.2d 591 THE SOUTH END BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. JOSEPH NASIN Supreme Court of Connecticut BALDWIN, C.J., MURPHY, MELLITZ, SHEA and ALCORN, Js. The fact that an endorsement is restrictive under the statutory definition (39-37) does not necessarily prevent the endorsee from being a holder in due course. The payee of a check […]

Read More