THE STATE v. SCHOFIELD, 114 Conn. 456 (1932)

159 A. 285 STATE OF CONNECTICUT vs. JOSEPH S. SCHOFIELD. Supreme Court of Connecticut MALTBIE, C. J., HAINES, HINMAN, BANKS and AVERY, Js. Under an information charging the defendant with the statutory crime of embezzlement by agent of stock and money, the essentials of proof are four: agency of the defendant, the receipt of the […]

Read More