SEIGEL v. HEIMOVITCH, 121 Conn. 207 (1936)

183 A. 741 CHARLES SEIGEL vs. EDWARD HEIMOVITCH ET ALS. Supreme Court of Connecticut MALTBIE, C. J., HINMAN, BANKS, AVERY and BROWN, Js. From a consideration of facts found, which could not be materially changed, held that the conclusion that no fraudulent conveyance or concealment of his assets by defendant H was established, was justified. […]

Read More