36 A.2d 739 THOMAS F. McCARTHY v. THE THAMES DYEING AND BLEACHING COMPANY. Supreme Court of Connecticut MALTBIE, C.J., JENNINGS, ELLS and DICKENSON, JS.[1] Because a plaintiff cannot substantiate a separable part of the claim in his complaint, he is not to be barred of recovery as regards that portion of it he can establish. […]
