AUGUR v. AUGUR, 133 Conn. 211 (1946)

49 A.2d 665 EDWARD D. AUGUR v. MARY H. AUGUR Supreme Court of Connecticut MALTBIE, C.J., BROWN, JENNINGS, ELLS and DICKENSON, Js. The plaintiff assigned error because of the absence of any finding “as a fact” that there was no intolerable cruelty. The burden was on the plaintiff to prove intolerable cruelty. The conclusion of […]

Read More