STATE v. TULLI, 208 Conn. 809 (1988)

545 A.2d 1105 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOSEPH N. TULLI Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 14 Conn. App. 356, is denied. Michael Graham, in support of the petition. Decided June 3, 1988

Read More

MEDIPLEX CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. WILLIAMS, 208 Conn. 808 (1988)

545 A.2d 1105 MEDIPLEX CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, INC. v. CLIFFORD WILLIAMS, SR., D.B.A. WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is denied. Mary E. Holzworth, in support of the petition. Andrew J. Pinkes, in opposition. Decided June 3, 1988 Page 809

Read More

STATE v. LEONARD, 208 Conn. 807 (1988)

545 A.2d 1105 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JAMES LEONARD Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 14 Conn. App. 134, is granted, limited to the issue: “Did the Appellate Court err in sustaining the conclusion of the trial court at the hearing on the motion to suppress […]

Read More

LYON v. ADGRAPHICS, INC., 208 Conn. 808 (1988)

545 A.2d 1105 WILLIAM C. LYON v. ADGRAPHICS, INC., ET AL. Supreme Court of Connecticut The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 14 Conn. App. 252, is denied. Lloyd L. Langhammer, in support of the petition. Wesley W. Horton, in opposition. Decided May 24, 1988

Read More

LYON v. ADGRAPHICS, INC., 208 Conn. 808 (1988)

545 A.2d 1105 WILLIAM C. LYON v. ADGRAPHICS, INC., ET AL. Supreme Court of Connecticut The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 14 Conn. App. 252, is denied. Lloyd L. Langhammer, in support of the petition. Wesley W. Horton, in opposition. Decided May 24, 1988

Read More

IN RE STEVEN G., 208 Conn. 810 (1988)

545 A.2d 1105 IN RE STEVEN G. Supreme Court of Connecticut The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 14 Conn. App. 205, is granted, limited to the issue: “In juvenile delinquency proceedings, what standard governs the authority of the state, after the commencement of trial, to amend the petition to include […]

Read More