568 A.2d 793 ALICE M. KALANDYK v. JOHN M. KALANDYK Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 801, is denied. John M. Kalandyk, pro se, in support of the petition. Decided November 29, 1989 Page 809
Articles Tagged: 568 A.2d 793
VENETUCCI v. SALVINO, 213 Conn. 807 (1989)
568 A.2d 793 NICHOLAS VENETUCCI v. PHYLLIS SALVINO Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is granted, limited to the following issue: “Is the controversy between the defendant and her former employer concerning the interpretation and enforcement of a covenant not to compete a `labor dispute’ as […]
STATE v. OSTOLAZA, 213 Conn. 808 (1989)
568 A.2d 793 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. SIMON OSTOLAZA Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 40, is denied. James J. Nixon and Penny Q. Seaman, in support of the petition. Timothy Sugrue, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided November 29, 1989
STATE v. OSTOLAZA, 213 Conn. 808 (1989)
568 A.2d 793 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. SIMON OSTOLAZA Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 40, is denied. James J. Nixon and Penny Q. Seaman, in support of the petition. Timothy Sugrue, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided November 29, 1989