62 A. 339 WILLIAM J. BOARDMAN ET AL., TRUSTEES, vs. LUCY H. BOARDMAN ET ALS. Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, Bridgeport, October Term, 1905. TORRANCE, C. J., BALDWIN, HAMERSLEY, HALL and PRENTICE, Js. The general rule, stated in Smith v. Dana, 77 Conn. 543 — that cash dividends upon corporate stock are to […]
Articles Tagged: 62 A. 339
BOARDMAN v. BOARDMAN, 78 Conn. 451 (1905)
62 A. 339 WILLIAM J. BOARDMAN ET AL., TRUSTEES, vs. LUCY H. BOARDMAN ET ALS. Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, Bridgeport, October Term, 1905. TORRANCE, C. J., BALDWIN, HAMERSLEY, HALL and PRENTICE, Js. The general rule, stated in Smith v. Dana, 77 Conn. 543 — that cash dividends upon corporate stock are to […]