MIGUEL ARROYO v. GLENN FOLLMER ET AL. (AC 23490).Appellate Court of Connecticut. Lavery, C.J., and Bishop and Hennessy, Js. Submitted on briefs September 19, 2003. Officially released November 4, 2003. Plaintiff’s appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford, Peck, J. Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed.
Articles Tagged: 80 Conn. App. 901
BURKE v. SYSTEMATIC AUTOMATION, INC., 80 Conn. App. 901 (2003)
KEVIN BURKE v. SYSTEMATIC AUTOMATION, INC. (AC 23715).Appellate Court of Connecticut. Schaller, Bishop and Hennessy, Js. Argued September 10, 2003. Officially released November 4, 2003. Defendant’s appeal from the workers’ compensation commissioner for the first district. Per Curiam. The decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner is affirmed. Page 902
MARTIN v. TOWN OF WESTPORT, 80 Conn. App. 901 (2003)
ROBERT E. MARTIN, JR. v. TOWN OF WESTPORT. (AC 23680).Appellate Court of Connecticut. West, DiPentima and Dupont, Js. Argued September 10, 2003. Officially released November 4, 2003. Plaintiff’s appeal from the workers’ compensation commissioner for the fourth district. Per Curiam. The decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner is affirmed.
EASTMAN v. SMITHIES, 80 Conn. App. 901 (2003)
RAE A. EASTMAN v. RICHARD SMITHIES ET AL. (AC 23237).Appellate Court of Connecticut. Bishop, McLachlan and Hennessy, Js. Argued September 9, 2003. Officially released November 4, 2003. Plaintiff’s appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Litchfield, Trombley, J. Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed.