632 A.2d 700

BARBARA THOMA ET AL. v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF CANTERBURY

(14830)Supreme Court of Connecticut

The plaintiffs Barbara Thoma and Theodore W. Dean’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 643 (AC 11524), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (a) Canterbury Zoning Regulation 4.12.3 requires, as a condition precedent to subdivision approval, inland wetlands approval; and (b) the zoning regulation conflicts with General Statutes 8-26?”

Angela Hawkins Fichter, in support of the petition.

Edward E. Moukawsher, in opposition.

Decided September 15, 1993

Tagged: