711 A.2d 741
(AC 17065)Appellate Court of Connecticut
Foti, Lavery and Daly, Js.
SYLLABUS
The plaintiff town appealed to this court from the trial court’s dismissal of its appeal from the decision by the defendant freedom of information commission determining that a certain gathering of four selectmen, the chairman of the board of finance and the town controller for the purpose of discussing a future meeting of the board of selectmen constituted a “meeting” within the meaning of the applicable provision (§ 1-18a [a]) of the Freedom of Information Act. Held that less than a quorum of the board of selectmen having been present at the gathering, the trial court improperly upheld the commission’s determination that it was a meeting within the meaning of § 1-18a (a).
Argued February 27, 1998
Officially released April 28, 1998
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Appeal from the decision by the named defendant determining that the plaintiff had violated the open meeting requirements of the Freedom of Information Act, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Windham at Putnam and tried to the court, McWeeny, J.; judgment dismissing the appeal, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court Reversed; judgment directed.
Richard S. Cody, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Victor Perpetua, commission counsel, with whom, on the brief, was Mitchell W. Pearlman, general counsel, for the appellee (named defendant).
OPINION
FOTI, J.
The plaintiff town of Windham appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court dismissing its administrative appeal, taken pursuant to General Statutes § 4-183, from a final decision of the freedom
Page 530
of information commission. The sole issue on appeal is whether a gathering of six town officials on March 20, 1995, constituted a “meeting” within the meaning of General Statutes § 1-18a (b).[1]
The undisputed facts are as follows. The Windham board of selectmen is a public agency within the meaning of General Statutes § 1-18a (a).[2]
On March 20, 1995, four of the selectmen, along with the chairman of the Windham board of finance and the town controller, met for approximately one-half hour. During that meeting, they discussed for five to ten minutes whether, at their regular meeting on the following day, they would support a proposal by the first selectman that the board go into executive session to discuss a landfill contract matter. The four selectmen, one of whom was the first selectman, arrived at a consensus that they would support the proposal at the next day’s meeting.
The commission ruled that the plaintiff violated General Statutes § 1-21
by holding a meeting without notice. The trial court upheld the commission’s decision that a meeting of the Windham board of selectmen (1) to discuss why an item needed to be considered in executive session, (2) to gather support for such a session,
Page 531
and (3) to reach a consensus was not a communication limited to notice of a meeting or the agenda of a meeting, and, therefore, was a meeting subject to the open meeting requirements of the Freedom of Information Act. General Statutes §§ 1-21 (a) and 1-21a (a).
The Windham board of selectmen consists of eleven selectmen. Six members constitute a quorum. At the March 20, 1995 gathering, only four members of the board were present. As a result, there was no quorum and, therefore, no meeting as defined by § 1-18a (b).[3] Our conclusion that the March 20, 1995 gathering was not a meeting makes it unnecessary to determine whether an exemption applies pursuant to § 1-18a (b).
The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded with direction to render judgment sustaining the plaintiff’s appeal.
In this opinion the other judges concurred.