224 A.2d 403
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The plaintiffs’ motion under Practice Book § 706 for a review of the taxation of costs having been considered, the court finds nothing erroneous in the clerk’s taxation of costs in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County.
Irving S. Ribicoff and Louise H. Hunt, in support of the motion.
Milton Sorokin and Joseph D. Hurwitz, in opposition.
Submitted November 2, 1966
Decided November 29, 1966
Page 735
MICHAEL A. FIANO v. OLD SAYBROOK FIRE COMPANY NO. 1, INC., ET AL. AC 39321…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOHN A. FRAZIER AC 38880 COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE…
ADRIANA RUIZ ET AL. v. VICTORY PROPERTIES, LLC AC 39381 COURT OF APPEALS OF THE…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MARY E. BAGNASCHI AC 39072 COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE…
AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. ANDREW MULDOWNEY ET AL. SC 19794 Supreme Court of Connecticut…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JARAH MICAH DAVIS AC 40232 COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE…