739 A.2d 265
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 601
(AC 18410), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) the `Brush deed’ contained two separate restrictive covenants, and that, therefore, the grantor intended that only one house was to be located on either lot 10 or lot 11; and (2) the statute of limitations contained in General Statutes § 52-575a had not expired with respect to the plaintiff’s claim of a violation of a covenant not to build?”
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16199.
Frederic S. Ury, in support of the petition.
Page 909
Stanley A. Twardy, Jr., Deborah S. Gordon an Mario R. Borelli, in opposition.
Decided October 6, 1999